If an OIG investigator were suddenly to appear on your Radiation Oncology practice’s doorstep, would you be prepared for the scrutiny?
You may very well be waving compliance red flags in your Radiation Oncology revenue cycle management—and not even know it—that send messages your compliance is not being taken seriously enough.
It’s time to take a hard look around your work environment and review the 10 telltale signs in a list provided by Robert A. Pelaia, Esq., CPC, CPCO. Each sign indicates to investigators they should delve deeper in your compliance activities. Note these are in no particular order:
1. Patient Records are in Plain Sight: This is a big Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) red flag. It shows that you have no regards for confidentiality of patient information.
2. You Have No Compliance Contact: Your office should designate someone to be in charge of compliance activities. Whether you have an individual or group of individuals responsible for compliance, it’s important to have a “go-to” person for compliance issues.
3. Coding Books are Outdated: Coders must keep on top of all the newest coding changes and if coders are using outdated coding books or software, that’s a compliance risk. It’s good to keep old coding books around as a historical reference; however, never code from outdated books.
4. Free Limousine Transportation Offered to Medicaid Patients: Section 1128A(a)(5) of the Social Security Act, enacted as part of HIPAA, imposes significant civil money penalties on providers who offer free gifts or services to Medicare or Medicaid beneficiaries that can influence the beneficiary to order items or services from the provider.
5. Coder “Cheat Sheets” are Posted: It’s alright for coders to have code lists to help work more efficiently; however, an OIG investigator might have a significant problem if the “cheat sheet” only reflects high level codes. For example, if you are listing new patient evaluation and management (E/M) codes on your “cheat sheet,” make sure you list all five levels of new patient E/M codes, not just ones that pay the most money.
6. Memos Posted Instructing Coders to Change Diagnosis Codes: It’s okay to have a list of “covered” diagnoses, but it is not appropriate for the coder to change the diagnosis to one not supported in the medical record. Posted memos telling coders to use particular codes only when submitted with certain “covered” diagnoses and to change to another code if the “wrong” diagnosis is submitted is a red flag to OIG investigators.
7. Coders Get Bonuses when Revenue Increases: The government will closely scrutinize a bonus structure paid to a coder based on increases in revenue because the arrangement might be an incentive for an unscrupulous coder to “up-code.” Coding is complex enough without muddying the water with bonus structures tied to revenue. The less risky route is to base the incentive on productivity, timeliness, or accuracy, rather than revenue.
8. Dusty Compliance Manual: A compliance manual should not sit on the bookshelf, as it should be a useful and comprehensive reference tool used often and updated periodically.
9. Employee Complaints with No Follow-up: An organization that receives complaints or uncovers evidence of improper billing must demonstrate it responded appropriately to the situation, including taking necessary steps to prevent further similar offenses. If the organization’s management personnel fail to investigate employee complaints promptly, this questions the effectiveness of the program.
10. Not Employing “Certified” Coders: You can tell a lot about a health care employer by the company it keeps—it is true that you get what you pay for. Employers who hire certified coders are employers who maintain higher standards, value integrity, and understand that compliance activities are a requirement.
Disclaimer: Information published in this article is the personal views of the author and is not intended to be, nor should it be considered, legal advice. Readers should consult with an attorney to discuss specific situations in further detail.
Special expertise in outsourced Radiation Oncology revenue cycle management is not a preference nowadays but a necessity. It takes unsurpassed attention to detail and continual follow through to not only decrease compliance risk but also generate the greatest percentage of revenue for Radiation Oncology practices.
revMD.com’s expertise in Radiation Oncology revenue cycle management uncovers developments in intra-operative radiation therapy coding and billing, billing evaluation/management services on the same day as drug administration and billing basic dosimetry calculations for IMRT courses. Our certified coders understand complex techniques such as stereotactic, intra-operative and IMRT, and zero in on what many facilities increasingly overlook – coding and documentation for basic processes.
revMD.com is the results-proven alternative for physician medical billing, with a niche specialization in radiation oncology coding and billing that generates unprecedented results and builds profitable medical practices. Leveraging a history of industry wide success spanning 26 years, revMD.com partners with medical practices throughout the U.S. to optimize revenue for hospital based and community based physicians. For more information, visit www.revmd.com.